BREAKING NEWS: WUV Owner has formally requested that the NCAA community review the recent game between the Mountaineers and Memphis, citing a series of questionable decisions and actions that….Read more

In a dramatic turn following one of the most intense matchups of the season, the owner of WUV has officially requested that the NCAA conduct a comprehensive review of the recent game between the Mountaineers and Memphis. The demand comes in the aftermath of a game marred by what are being described as highly questionable decisions on the court—decisions that some believe may have directly influenced the outcome.

The highly anticipated matchup delivered on excitement, but it also sparked controversy that has continued to ripple throughout the college basketball community. While Memphis walked away with the win on paper, the manner in which the game concluded has raised serious concerns from fans, analysts, and now, institutional figures.

In a formal statement, the WUV owner cited a “pattern of questionable officiating and procedural missteps,” particularly during the second half, when the game reached a boiling point. Among the concerns outlined were disputed foul calls, missed violations, and a key possession late in the game that appeared to be awarded incorrectly following an out-of-bounds play.

“There were several moments during the game where the integrity of the officiating came into question,” the statement read. “This is not about a single call—it’s about a series of decisions that seemed inconsistent with the standards expected at this level of competition.”

The statement also emphasizes the need for accountability and transparency within the NCAA’s officiating and game review systems, suggesting that the credibility of the sport depends on it. “We owe it to the athletes, the fans, and the institutions involved to ensure that games are decided fairly on the court—not influenced by errors or inconsistencies.”

Social media erupted during and after the game, with fans dissecting every moment through replays and slow-motion breakdowns. Hashtags like #MountaineersDeserveBetter and #NCAAReviewNow trended within hours. Numerous sports analysts joined the conversation, some defending the officials’ calls, while others echoed the sentiment that the game needs to be looked at more closely.

One particularly debated moment occurred in the final minutes of the game when a potential go-ahead possession for the Mountaineers was cut short by a foul call that many viewers—and former referees—have deemed “highly questionable.” Compounding the frustration was a failure to review a potential clock error, which may have shaved crucial seconds off the final play.

Despite the backlash, the NCAA has yet to issue an official statement or indicate whether a review will take place. However, insiders suggest that the growing public outcry and the formal nature of the WUV owner’s request could prompt action.

“This isn’t just about one game,” a sports law expert commented. “This is about the precedent we set for handling disputes when the integrity of competition is in question.”

For now, the Mountaineers and their supporters are left with a bitter taste, and the spotlight is squarely on the NCAA. Whether this request leads to a formal review or any actionable outcomes remains uncertain, but one thing is undeniable: the conversation around officiating and accountability in college sports has been reignited in a major way.

As the story unfolds, all eyes will be on the NCAA and how it chooses to respond—not just for the sake of one game, but for the long-term credibility of the sport.